The text on the extension of the sending of a compromise agreement in the case of an exparte application is about the objective of convincing the reader. Indeed, in the writings presented in such situations, the author tries to share an opinion, that is, their perspective, but also facts and examples to “convince” the reader of his perspective. It is a type of movement that is adopted by a judge, in the event that, in order to understand the text on the exparte movement, one must know the defined meaning of the exparte movement. The author`s objective in drafting an application for an extension of an ex-part compromise agreement is to convince the court to grant an extension (more time). An ex-parte application means that the lawyer is pleading on behalf of a party or an outside party. On the other hand, a compromise agreement is an out-of-court agreement in which two or more parties agree on conditions acceptable to both parties. This then reduces the case of litigation or judicial intervention. We already have a very slow justice system and if cases that are not essential still reach the courts, they will overload the system. There are cases where an out-of-court settlement could be reached, so that is the best option. An amicable agreement means a compromise agreement. A case of disagreement over child visits is an example.
Fathers have the right to visit their children, but in most cases, mothers limit fathers to visiting their children, unless they pay (needless to say fathers should provide). Instead of going through a very difficult action that would have a negative impact on the child, the parties could simply reach a compromise agreement. This compromise agreement must be formal and written and subject to the approval of the judge. -The judge heard this complaint and adopted a motion from the Exparte-decree – the plaintiff appears for the court hearing, but the defendant does not appear, so the court hears the appeal filed.