The new safe does not change two basic functions that we consider important for startups: all the details have been added as in the picture. Some fields are not visible at first. However, if you add the details in accordance with the agreement, the fields will be displayed. Once you`ve filled in all the details, click “Send.” As has already been said, the old SAFE notes did not allow investors to know how much property they were receiving and the founders knew how much of their assets were diluted. In principle, it was important for the valuation of dilution and ownership to take into account the theoretical increase in shares on the company`s options pool in a series of shares at a later date. In 2013, startup accelerator Y Combinator (a Silicon Valley accelerator) introduced an instrument known as a Simple Future Capital Agreement (SAFE). It was created as a simpler alternative to traditional convertible bonds. It allows startups to easily structure their upfront capital assets, with no maturities or interest rates. Our first safe was a “pre-money” safe, because at the time of its launch, startups collected smaller sums of money before collecting a funding cycle (typically a Preferred Stock Round Series).
The safe was a quick and simple way to get the first money into the business, and the concept was that safe owners were only early investors in this future price cycle. But fundraising, staged early on, grew in the years following the introduction of the initial safe, and now startups are raising far more money than the first “seeds” funding cycle. While safes are used for these seed rounds, these towers are really better regarded as totally separate financing, instead of turning “bridges” into subsequent price cycles. While this concept is consistent with the original concept of SAFE notes, it has not made sense in the world where SAFes have become independent funding cycles. Thus, the old proportional right was removed from the new SAFE notes. But there is a new model letter that offers investors a proportional right in financing the stock series both on the basis of investors as a safe property transformed, which is also now much more transparent. At the end of 2013, Y Combinator published the Simple Agreement for Future Equity (“SAFE”) investment instrument as an alternative to convertible debt.  This investment vehicle is now known in the U.S. and Canada because of its simplicity and low transaction costs. However, as use is increasingly frequent, concerns have arisen about its potential impact on entrepreneurs, particularly where several SAFE investment cycles take place prior to a private equity cycle and potential risks to un accredited crowdfunding investors who could invest in the SAFes of companies that realistically, never receive venture capital financing and therefore never convert to equity.  Nevertheless, the proposed compromise is the greatest clarity of ownership and future dilution would foster investor confidence and give the founders a much better idea of how their property would be diluted. Finally, this can help to settle in a favorable position for the following rounds.
Here are some other thoughts on the breakdown of equities: although the safe is not suitable for all financing situations, the conditions must be balanced taking into account the interests of the start-up and investors. As with the original safe, there are always trade-offs between simplicity and completeness, so that while not all Edge cases are addressed, we believe that the safe covers the most relevant and common issues. Both parties are encouraged to have their lawyers` safes checked if they wish, but we believe it provides a starting point that can be used in most situations without change.